The 2025 Inspiring Workplaces Awards are open. Deadline to enter for all regions is Feb 19, 2025
Enter Now
Date posted: 20th September 2024

20th September 2024

Amazon Mandates 5-Day Office Return – Why Companies Fear Remote Work?

Amazon Mandates 5-Day Office Return – Why Companies Fear Remote Work?

Amazon’s decision to mandate a five-day return-to-office (RTO) policy starting January 2025 has sparked debate about the motives behind the shift away from remote work. Concerns include innovation, company culture, and trust in employees. Critics argue that forcing in-office work may hurt productivity, job satisfaction, and retention, especially among remote work advocates.

This article was written by Rachel Wells published in Forbes.

In recent news that has exploded across the internet like wildfire, Amazon has become the latest company to join the ranks of employers mandating a full return-to-office policy, to be actioned on January 2, 2025.

According to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy’s memo that was shared with CNBC, the organization’s senior leadership team wants to make two major shifts with the goal of improving their overall efficiency at work, driving higher performance, removing silos and unnecessarily complicated processes, and empowering a culture of innovation, connection, and rapid growth.

Two issues identified from the memo, which Jassy raised, were first, having “the right organizational structure to drive the level of ownership and speed we desire,” and second, being “set up to invent, collaborate, and be connected enough to each other (and our culture) to deliver the absolute best for customers and the business that we can.”

What sent shockwaves across social media and the internet was when the CEO announced, as the solution for the second problem, that the company would be initiating not one, not two, not even three or four, but five full days in the office (with the exception being extenuating circumstances or an approved remote work exception).

“Amazon has announced 5 day RTO, which is unfortunate because I’m interested in working for a living, not live-action role playing and virtue signaling,” one LinkedIn member and AWS employee posted to LinkedIn. “If you have remote opportunities available, please message me. Nothing is off the table. I’d rather go back to school than work in an office again,” he said.

What Happens When Employees Are Forced To Return To Office?

When you consider the effects of driving employees to full-time in-office work, it seems pretty counterintuitive when it comes to increasing productivity, morale, and company culture.

The numbers are striking:

  • Only 2% of workers prefer fully on-site work over remote or hybrid models.
  • A mere 3% say their job satisfaction is greatest when working 100% on-site.
  • Similarly, only 3% feel most motivated or feel most productive in an all-office environment.

(This data is captured from LiveCareer’s Fears and Remote Work report 2024.)

Jake Smith, a CEO of a workspace solutions company, sees both sides of the issue: “While in-person interaction is valuable for company culture, forcing all employees back full-time could hamper productivity and work-life balance.”

Referencing his company, Evo Technologies, Smith said “we implemented automated solutions like AI agents and smart office software to enable seamless remote work. Productivity increased over 20% as employees gained more flexibility and autonomy. However, we still encourage in-person meetups a few times a month for collaboration.

“A hybrid model provides the best of both worlds. While technologies enable remote productivity, total return to office risks losing top talent seeking more flexibility. Companies should trust employees and managers to find the right balance for their teams. A one-size-fits-all mandate hampers creativity that thrives with autonomy,” Smith believes.

Andrei Kurtuy, co-founder of resume builder software company Novoresume, believes that Amazon’s recent decision to require employees to return to the office full-time by January 2025 sets a concerning precedent, especially for those who have found remote work more productive and aligned with their personal lives.

He weighs in: “While Amazon claims in-person collaboration enhances innovation and efficiency, many employees have adapted to remote work environments that allow them to focus better and maintain a healthier work-life balance.

“I think this shift will negatively impact workers who have come to prefer the flexibility and productivity gains of working from home. Forcing them back into a traditional office setting may lead to lower job satisfaction, higher turnover, and challenges in retaining top talent, especially among those who excel in a remote environment. Many industries have proven that remote work doesn’t hinder innovation but, instead, fosters new ways of collaboration with digital tools.

“Amazon’s move seems out of step with modern work trends, which are increasingly embracing flexibility. While in-office work may benefit some roles, applying a blanket policy could alienate a large portion of the workforce who have thrived remotely.”